,Tennis,Sport&c5=Tennis&c6=Press+Association&c7=11-Jun-15&c8=1593969&c9=Article&c10=News&c11=Sport&c13=&c25=&c30=content&h2=GU/Sport/Wimbledon+2011)
• Rafael Nadal is top seed ahead of Novak Djokovic
• Kim Clijsters forced to withdraw through injury
Andy Murray has been handed the fourth seeding for Wimbledon as expected after the All England Club elected to adhere to the top five in the world rankings.
The defending champion, Rafael Nadal, is therefore the top seed for the men's draw ahead of Novak Djokovic, with the six-times winner Roger Federer third on the list.
The returning women's champion, Serena Williams, is the eighth seed despite her world ranking dropping to 26 following her long lay-off due to injury and illness. Her sister Venus is seeded 24. The world No1 Caroline Wozniacki is the women's top seed.
Murray's seeding ensures he will not play any of the top four before the semi-finals as he aims to claim his breakthrough grand slam success on home turf.
Nadal's top billing, meanwhile, has meant that Federer will not be the top seed for the first time since his maiden Wimbledon success in 2003. Nadal had been the first seed in 2009, but he was forced to withdraw on the eve of the tournament due to injury, while last year the All England Club named Federer as top seed despite being ranked behind Nadal.
Organisers have made only subtle changes from the world rankings this time around with last year's beaten finalist, Tomas Berdych, the sixth seed, up one place from his world mark, while Andy Roddick is two places higher at eighth.
In the women's draw, the withdrawal of the second-seeded Kim Clijsters meant the players below her all moved up a place, with Tsvetana Pironkova coming in at number 32.
With the world No1 Caroline Wozniacki given top billing, Vera Zvonareva is the new second seed, Li Na third, Victoria Azarenka fourth and the former winner Maria Sharapova fifth.
Men
1. Rafael Nadal, Spain
2. Novak Djokovic, Serbia
3. Roger Federer, Switzerland
4. Andy Murray, Britain
5. Robin Sodering, Sweden
6. Tomas Berdych, Czech Republic
7. David Ferrer, Spain
8. Andy Roddick, United States
9. Gaël Monfils, France
10. Mardy Fish, United States
11. Jürgen Melzer, Austria
12. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, France
13. Viktor Troicki, Serbia
14. Stanislas Wawrinka, Switzerland
15. Gilles Simon, France
16. Nicolás Almagro, Spain
17. Richard Gasquet, France
18. Mikhail Youzhny, Russia
19. Michael Llodra, France
20. Florian Mayer, Germany
21. Fernando Verdasco, Spain
22. Alexandr Dolgopolov, Ukraine
23. Janko Tipsarevic, Serbia
24. Juan Martín del Potro, Argentina
25. Juan Ignacio Chela, Argentina
26. Guillermo García-López, Spain
27. Marin Cilic, Croatia
28. David Nalbandian, Argentina
29. Nikolay Davydenko, Russia
30. Thomaz Bellucci, Brazil
31. Milos Raonic, Canada
32. Marcos Baghdatis, Cyprus
Women
1. Caroline Wozniacki, Denmark
2. Vera Zvonareva, Russia
3. Li Na, China
4. Victoria Azarenka, Belarus
5. Maria Sharapova, Russia
6. Francesca Schiavone, Italy
7. Serena Williams, United States
8. Petra Kvitova, Czech Republic
9. Marion Bartoli, France
10. Sam Stosur, Australia
11. Andrea Petkovic, Germany
12. Svetlana Kuznetsova, Russia
13. Agnieszka Radwanska, Poland
14. Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, Russia
15. Jelena Jankovic, Serbia
16. Julia Görges, Germany
17. Kaia Kanepi, Estonia
18. Ana Ivanovic, Serbia
19. Yanina Wickmayer, Belgium
20. Peng Shuai, China
21. Flavia Pennetta, Italy
22. Shahar Peer, Israel
23. Venus Williams, United States
24. Dominika Cibulkova, Slovakia
25. Daniela Hantuchova, Slovakia
26. Maria Kirilenko, Russia
27. Jarmila Gajdosova, Australia
28. Ekaterina Makarova, Russia
29. Roberta Vinci, Italy
30. Bethanie Mattek-Sands, United States
31. Lucie Safarova, Czech Republic
32. Tsvetana Pironkova, Bulgaria
Wimbledon 2011WimbledonAndy MurrayTennisguardian.co.uk
Why does women’s tennis seem a shadow of its former self? | Simon Cambers
Insiders admit to problems but believe that key tennis criticisms are only half of the real story
The world No1 should win the best eventsIt is not just tennis where the world No1 ranking is questioned. Caroline Wozniacki may not have won a grand slam but neither has Luke Donald, who leads the world golf rankings. But as with Donald, it is not Wozniacki's fault. The Dane has made one final – the 2008 US Open – but is top of the tree thanks to her overall consistency throughout the year.
The Russian Dinara Safina and Jelena Jankovic of Serbia also became No1 without winning a slam in recent years and tennis fans have been spoilt by having Martina Navratilova, Chris Evert, Steffi Graf, Monica Seles, Martina Hingis, Serena and Venus Williams at the top of the rankings in the past.
But even before her injury and illness, Serena used to pick and choose her tournaments, focusing on the grand slams rather than playing a full schedule. Kim Clijsters, the world No2, has done the same since her return after two years away. The Tour offers more ranking points for the grand slam events than regular events but until the very best players compete all year round or until one player dominates, the situation with Wozniacki could keep on happening.
On the other hand, Olga Morozova, the Russian who reached the Wimbledon and French Open final in 1974 and now a famed coach, believes some of the new breed do not have what it takes to be No1. "We just don't have leaders," she says. "There's only one person who I can see, Maria Sharapova, who is not afraid to be No1. With Serena or Venus, it doesn't matter how they play because they would still be leading the game. They have a presence, they are winners. There are not many people who have that."
The standard of play has fallenIt is certainly hard to see any player being out for a year in the men's game, and being made favourite for Wimbledon, so strong are the top four players. But this is Serena Williams we're talking about. The American has won 13 grand slam titles and most importantly, has won grand slams after long absences before – the Australian Open in 2007 for example, when she had slipped to No81 in the rankings.
"I think Serena will go down as one of the greatest players who ever lived, no doubt about it," Chris Evert says. "In my mind, Steffi and Martina are the greatest because they consistently were on the Tour for 15 years. But definitely Serena, as far as her tennis goes, would be considered one of the greatest players ever."
It is, of course, down to the bookmakers to set the prices and as Graham Sharpe, of William Hill, says: "A lot of people who bet on Wimbledon don't bet on tennis any other time of the year and they like the big names." She should not be favourite but as we have seen many times before, nothing can be taken for granted. "It would be monumental in my mind if Serena pulled off the win," Evert adds. "You can never, ever count her out but I don't know how it's humanly possible."
There are no rivalries in the sport and no starsTo have a rivalry, you need two players at the top of the game who are able to beat each other. That is not the situation right now as it has been so often in the past. But Brad Gilbert, Andy Murray's former coach and a top-10 player in his own right, thinks the women may be victims of their own improvement, especially in terms of athleticism. Standards have raised rather than fallen.
"For the last few years it's probably the most open that women's tennis has ever been," Gilbert says. "We're used to seeing a couple of women dominate for long periods of time. I think between No1 and No15 they've never been closer in their play. There's a lot of depth in the men's game but there's a lot bigger gap between 15 and one than there is right now in the women's."
In terms of stars, Clijsters might have something to say about that. The Belgian has won three of the past seven grand slam events and until she got injured in the clay-court season, was well on her way to becoming No1 again. The victory by Li Na at the French Open made her an even bigger star in China than she already was. The (second) retirement of Justine Henin in January robbed the sport of another of its stars.
"Remember that men's tennis was getting criticised a while ago because there were no rivalries," says Evert, who now covers the game as a correspondent for ESPN in America. "Right now, there is a bit of a flux in women's tennis. There's more depth, more new names and it will be interesting to see who steps up to the plate and emerges."
Good young players are not coming throughIn addition to the increased depth in the women's game, the most notable change over the past decade has been the move away from the teen phenomenon to the more seasoned, experienced players at the top of the game. In 1997, a 16-year-old Martina Hingis ruled the world and Anna Kournikova was just one of many starlets, the latest in a long line that began with Evert and included Graf, Seles, Tracy Austin and Jennifer Capriati. Now the Briton, Heather Watson, is the youngest player in the top 100 at 19 years old.
Restrictions on the number of tournaments teenagers can play have been important but technology and an emphasis on physical strength has changed the way the game is played. Gone are the days of a top player cruising through to the second week with the loss of only a few games, as Graf used to do on a regular basis.
"It takes longer to develop an all-court game," says Evert. "I think I was the first 15-year-old to come along and beat a No1 player, then Steffi beat me at 15 when I was No1. Jennifer Capriati at 15 was great. The game is so much more athletic so that's where experience also comes in. But also, every 10 years or so a young phenom has come along and actually we're about due for one now."
Women's tennis is boring to watchTell that to Francesca Schiavone, one of the most inventive and inspirational players on either Tour. Though baseline tennis remains the bread and butter on the women's circuit, the Italian has shown that there is room for flair. It's true that the top men have a wider range of shots and that they volley more often than the women but Schiavone, and others like her, can use spin, angles and guile to counter the natural power of others.
Tell it to the fans. According to the Women's Tennis Association, attendances for women's matches were up 5% at their premier events in 2010 and 4% at the next level of tournaments. In a time of global economic crisis, only one tournament lost its title sponsor and 19 players earned over $1m dollars in prize money. "Withdrawals are down; top player participation is up; prize money is up and so is attendance. Our game is doing quite well," says the WTA chief executive, Stacey Allaster.
Morozova says she felt the increase in overall power in the women's game means that the players have had to learn how to use their brain. "It used to be that they just learnt to hit. Now they learn to hit and play."
Wimbledon 2011WimbledonTennisSimon Cambersguardian.co.uk